Gemtc r package bayesian netmeta r package frequentist. However, when there is substantial unaccounted heterogeneity in. Network meta analysis and network meta regression in the bayesian framework. Multilevel meta network analysis with application to. Meta regression is a statistical method that can be implemented following a traditional meta analysis and can be regarded as an extension to it. Meta regression is a tool used in meta analysis to examine the impact of moderator variables on study effect size using regression based techniques. A simple regression model for network metaanalysis. Furthermore, critical appraisal of network meta analyses. Step by step instructions on how to run a network meta analysis using winbugs. Metaregression comprehensive metaanalysis software. Many combinations of direct or indirect interactions. A microsoftexcelbased tool for running and critically. Sep, 2017 organisations such as the national institute for health and care excellence require the synthesis of evidence from existing studies to inform their decisionsfor example, about the best available treatments with respect to multiple efficacy and safety outcomes.
Frequentist network metaanalysis using the r package netmeta. Multivariate and network metaanalysis of multiple outcomes. Running a network metaanalysis using winbugs youtube. Package bmeta january 8, 2016 type package title bayesian meta analysis and meta regression version 0. This r function is a wrapper function for r function rma. Tackle heterogeneity using subgroup analyses and meta regression. However, bias is still present if there are systematic differences in treatment effect modifiers across. Indirect treatment comparisons itc and network metaanalysis nma are approaches for quantitatively summarizing an evidence base in. While effect moderation aka effect modification aka interaction effects is common enough in applied data analysis, i wonder if you are interested in a. The aim of this paper is to propose a transparent, alternative approach for network meta analysis based on a regression model that allows inclusion of studies with three or more treatment arms. Software for network meta analysis general purpose software. Istandard errors calculated from the variancecovariance matrix. The main technical requirement for all approaches is that all interventions included in the analysis form a connected network. Which software can create a network metaanalysis for free.
Metaregression is a technique for performing a regression analysis to assess the relationship between the treatment effects and the study characteristics of interest e. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking statistics in. Despite its usefulness network meta analysis is often criticized for its complexity and for being accessible only to researchers with strong statistical and. Since then, the use of network meta analysis has risen steadily 4 and many health technology assessment. Furthermore, critical appraisal of network meta analyses conducted in winbugs can be challenging. Stata has a long history of meta analysis methods contributed by stata researchers, for instance, palmer and sterne 2016. The software automatically generates models for network metaanalysis suitable for mcmc software, like winbugs, openbugs and jags.
Bayesian methods suitable for indirect treatment comparison or mixed treatment comparison were published by lu and ades in 2004 3. Much like conventional meta regression see chapter 8, we can use this functionality to determine if specific study characteristics influence the magnitude of effect sizes found in our network. The engine behind this analysis power is the software developed in the metaforproject. Winbugs, a freely available bayesian software package, has been the most widely used software package to conduct network meta analyses. At it is our mission to develop information technology to assist and improve how decisions regarding the use of medicines are made. Dont worry if it doesnt entirely make sense right away though if it does, kudos. We hope you will find the material presented useful. Network meta analysis nma, also called multiple treatment meta analysis, or mixed treatment comparison, aims to synthesize the effect sizes of several studies that evaluate multiple interventions or treatments 14. The rest of the material on this page goes into details and explains how to conceptualize and code a bayesian meta analysis. Metaregression columbia university mailman school of. There are few free software for network metaanalysis and are easy to use. It has usually been performed in a bayesian setting, but recently it has become possible in a frequentist setting using multivariate meta analysis and meta regression, implemented in stata. It is one of my favorite regression analysis software as it provides different regression techniques and a lot of other statistical data analytic methods.
We aim to deliver valuable working software which is continuously improved based on feedback from users and researchers. Network meta analysis compares multiple interventions simultaneously by analyzing studies making different comparisons in the same analysis. Network meta analysis can be performed using several approaches salanti et al 2008. These metaanalysis methods are also referred to as network metaanalyses dias et al. Metaregression models to address heterogeneity and. With these models the hazard ratio is not assumed to be constant over time, thereby reducing the possibility of violating transitivity in indirect comparisons. An updated collection from the stata journal, second edition, which brought together all the stata journal. Despite its usefulness network meta analysis is often criticized for its complexity and for being accessible only to researchers with strong statistical and computational skills. Dec 26, 2014 network metaanalysis nma a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same metaanalysis simultaneously has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. In network meta analysis, several alternative treatments can be compared by pooling the evidence of all randomised comparisons made in different studies. Meta regression is more effective at this task than are standard meta analytic techniques. We hope you will find the software presented useful.
Incorporated indirect conclusions require a consistent network of treatment effects. Specifically, we develop a new strategy of grouping the variances of random effects, in which we first formulate possible sets of the groups of the treatments based on their clinical mechanisms of action and then use bayesian model. However, relevant studies may not provide direct evidence about all the treatments or outcomes of interest. Indirect treatment comparisons and network meta analyses. Bayesian network tools in java both inference from network, and learning of network. Much of this material comes from a workshop run by keith. For more advanced meta analyses like meta regression, multilevel and network meta analysis the metafor package for r might be useful for you. It supports all major meta analysis methods, plus, uniquely, the inverse variance heterogeneity and quality effects models.
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in costeffectiveness analysis. A network metaanalysis toolkit cochrane comparing multiple. Winbugs, openbugs, jags bayesian by far most used, most exible meta regression software frequentist multivariate meta analysis software frequentist e. The first video is a brief 10 min, nontechnical introduction recorded in 2016 by georgia salanti from institute of social and preventive medicine, university of bern, switzerland, and university of. Indirect comparison meta analysis methods also called network meta analyses, in particular when multiple treatments are assessed simultaneously generally use two main methodologies. In the last decade, network meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has been introduced as an extension of pairwise meta analysis.
Network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Visualizing inconsistency in network metaanalysis by. Stata software for pairwise and network metaanalysis methods team. Nov 15, 2017 these include fixed and random effects analysis, fixed and mixed effects meta regression, forest and funnel plots, tests for funnel plot asymmetry, trimandfill and failsafe n analysis, and more. Often when performing a meta analysis on the effectiveness of certain interventions, we are less interested in the question if one particular intervention is effective e. An interesting aspect of this type of meta analysis is the possibility to explore the impact of moderatorseffect modifiers in a complex evidence network. The advantage of network meta analysis over standard pairwise meta analysis is that it facilitates indirect comparisons of multiple interventions that have not been studied in a headtohead fashion. If you use the stata routines please kindly cite the articles that describe them. Organisations such as the national institute for health and care excellence require the synthesis of evidence from existing studies to inform their decisionsfor example, about the best available treatments with respect to multiple efficacy and safety outcomes. Metaregression comprehensive metaanalysis software cma. As i understand it, network meta analysis can be implemented at either the arm level or the contrast level. As of stata 16, stata has an official suite of meta analysis commands. Stata now offers the new suite of commands, meta, to perform meta analysis. Multivariate meta analysis and pairwise meta regression using frequentist methods both can be used for network meta analysis but this requires significant.
For more advanced meta analyses like meta regression, multilevel and network meta analysis the metafor package for. Check if selective outcome reporting publication bias or p. It describes the implementation of network metaanalysis in stata note that stata is spelled like that not in capitals. Network meta analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies usually randomized trials comparing several treatments or interventions. May 01, 2020 network meta analysis compares multiple interventions simultaneously by analyzing studies making different comparisons in the same analysis. The first video is a brief 10 min, nontechnical introduction recorded in 2016 by georgia salanti from institute of social and preventive medicine, university of bern, switzerland, and university of ioannina school of medicine, ioannina, greece the second video is a 2014 recording of the. In this article, we propose a new approach to carry out bayesian inference for armbased network meta regression. Networkmetaanalysisisametaregressionwithdummyvariables forthetreatments.
An introduction to network metaanalysis mixed treatment. In section 3, i describe the data and the analytical strategies used to demonstrate the multilevel meta network analysis. Chapter 11 network metaanalysis doing metaanalysis in r. The new suite is broad, yet one of its strengths is its simplicity. Network metaanalysis nma a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same metaanalysis simultaneously has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. It can provide a threelevel meta analysis taking account of clustering and allowing for level 2 and level 3 heterogeneity. Indirect treatment comparisons and network meta analyses for. Note, results are not backtransformed in printouts of meta analyses using summary measures with transformations, e. Key concepts in network meta analysis nma the following two videos will introduce you to the key concepts in network meta analysis nma. Apr 08, 2019 the objective of this study is to describe the general approaches to network meta analysis that are available for quantitative data synthesis using r software. First, is the bucher method 45 which is a single or repeated comparison of a closed loop of threetreatments such that one of them is common to the two studies. We conducted a network meta analysis using two approaches.
Which is the best method for network metaregression. Jun 02, 2012 step by step instructions on how to run a network meta analysis using winbugs. The mvmeta command in stata employs a recent approach to network meta analysis that handles the different treatment comparisons appeared in studies as. Network meta analysis synthesizes direct and indirect evidence in a network of trials that compare multiple interventions and has the potential to rank the competing treatments according to the studied outcome. A network metaanalysis nma toolkit cochrane training. Ades ae, sculpher m, sutton a, abrams k, cooper n, welton n. A simple method for indirect treatment comparison was first introduced by bucher et al. The winbugs software can be called from either r provided r2winbugs as an r package or stata software for network meta analysis. Sep 29, 2014 the use of network meta analysis has increased dramatically in recent years. Minimal guidance exists on how to rate the quality of evidence supporting treatment effect estimates obtained from nma. This is the manual for the gemtc user interface for network meta analysis. One big asset of the gemtc package is that it allows us to conduct network meta regressions. It starts with a brief introduction to network meta analysis in the bayesian framework, including issues such as model fit and. The following two videos will introduce you to the key concepts in network meta analysis nma.
Software for evidence synthesis and predictive modelling. Recently, network meta analysis of survival data with a multidimensional treatment effect was introduced. Network meta analysis nma a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta analysis simultaneously has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. Network meta analysis nma, combining direct and indirect comparisons, is increasingly being used to examine the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions. These features include audit, bain, network, machine learning regression, classification, clustering, meta analysis, structural equation modeling sem, and summary statistics. The network estimates are weighted sums of the observed estimates with weights coming from the rows of h. The use of network meta analysis has increased dramatically in recent years. Software and package applicating for network metaanalysis. An assessment of this assumption and of the influence of deviations is fundamental for the validity evaluation. Is network metaanalysis as valid as standard pairwise meta. The software automatically generates models for network meta analysis suitable for mcmc software, like winbugs, openbugs and jags. Lets first go through a quick illustration of a bayesian meta analysis. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Using stata for standard pairwise and network meta analysis.
Difference between metaanalysis, metaregression and. In section 2, i introduce the multilevel meta regressions for meta network analysis. Network meta analysis for decisionmaking takes an approach to evidence synthesis that is specifically intended for decision making when there are two or more treatment alternatives being evaluated, and assumes that the purpose of every synthesis is to answer the question for this preidentified population of patients, which treatment is best. A grade working group approach for rating the quality of. If you use it, please kindly cite the articles that describe them. Unlike r, stata software needs to create relevant ado scripts at. We present a fourstep approach to rate the quality of evidence. Bayesian inference for network metaregression using. See statas full list of official meta analysis features stata users have also developed numerous excellent commands for performing meta analyses. In my own meta analysis, however, authors rarely report the outcome at the arm level, and much of my data had to be extracted using test statistics from the comparison between arms e. Petticrew et al 20 network meta analyses are best designed for. However, bias is still present if there are systematic differences in treatment effect modifiers across comparisons. In the conventional pairwise meta analysis, the researchers collect studies that evaluate the same treatment, create pairs of the. Cochrane comparing multiple intervention methods group compiled a suite of online materials and software tools for conducting network metaanalysis.
888 1359 1023 1197 219 729 7 925 1266 1381 312 904 157 599 721 716 590 698 776 1334 277 1386 36 1086 11 1435 1441 221 536 1440 1006 1560 924 234 50 723 1348 219 1282 350 1317 933 248 1372